Cui bono? Gauging the successes of publicly-funded plant breeding in retrospect
January 2015
|
Chapter
|
Intellectual Property and Genetically Modified Organisms: A Convergence in Laws
Intellectual property and genetically modified organisms
January 2015
|
Chapter
|
Intellectual Property and Genetically Modified Organisms: A Convergence in Laws
Intellectual property and genetically modified organisms: A convergence in laws
January 2015
|
Book
Taking a global viewpoint, this volume addresses issues arising from recent developments in the enduring and topical debates over Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and their relationship to Intellectual Property (IP). The work examines changing responses to the growing acceptance and prevalence of GMOs. Drawing together perspectives from several of the leading international scholars in this area, the contributions seek to break away from analysis of safety and regulation and examine the diversity of ways the law and GMOs have become entangled.This collection presents the start of a much broader engagement with GMOs and law. As GMO technology becomes increasingly more complex and embedded in our lives, this volume will be a useful resource in leading further discussion and debate about GMOs in academia, in government and among those working on future policy.
Experiments in empire-building: Mendelian genetics as a national, imperial, and global agricultural enterprise
June 2013
|
Journal article
|
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields
Seeds Without Patents
January 2013
|
Journal article
|
Revue économique
38 Economics, 3801 Applied Economics, 3803 Economic Theory
Under one leaf: an historical perspective on the UK Plant Science Federation.
July 2012
|
Journal article
|
The New phytologist
Plants, Breeding, Botany, Genetic Research, Molecular Biology, Genes, Plant, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Societies, Scientific, United Kingdom
Arguing over adulteration: the success of the Analytical Sanitary Commission.
December 2008
|
Journal article
|
Endeavour
In the Lancet in the 1850s a series of reports described gruesome levels of adulteration in Londoners' food. Following a government inquiry, The Times lauded the supposed hero of the hour, Arthur Hill Hassall MD. In response a furious and acrimonious argument erupted in the letters-pages of The Times and two other medical journals. The details of this argument reveal that not everybody agreed that the success of the Analytical Sanitary Commission was down to Hassall's scientific evidence.
Humans, Sanitation, Food Contamination, History, 19th Century, Public Health Administration, Periodicals as Topic, United Kingdom
Geneticists on the Farm: agriculture, genetics and the all-English loaf, 1900-1930