Professor Vincent Gillespie

At the core of most of what I do is a curiosity about the psychology of literary response: the ways in which writers struggle to express experiences and acts of imagination, the strategies they use to articulate their understanding of these experiences and imaginative acts, and the codes and conventions that develop between texts and readers to allow communication and understanding to develop and to be manipulated. What the Arabs called ‘the imaginative syllogism’ drives my interest in medieval poetic (as sharply distinguished from rhetorical) theory as it can be recovered from commentaries and theoretical writings from the twelfth through to the sixteenth centuries.

My long standing interest in contemplative writing fits very precisely into this category of exploration. Religious texts always seek to make an impact within a recoverable target range of acceptable responses, and the techniques they use offer fascinating fields for analysis, not least because those impacts are rarely sufficient in themselves and so always gesture to their own effacement as part of an ongoing and continuous process of cognitive and emotional understanding.  These texts are songs from the threshold of lived experience, struggling to articulate and communicate ineffable showings or transcendent encounters. Hence my continuing fascination with Julian of Norwich, and her highly sophisticated and playfully manipulative relationship with the broad spectrum of religious writing in her period. This interest has linked back towards my original researches into catechetic and pastoral literature to give me an unusually broad view of, and sharp perspective on the field of ‘vernacular theology’ as it is now constituted. It also fuels my growing desire to explore the (as yet largely unarticulated) linguistic and semantic theory and (very substantial) praxis lying behind the extensive vernacular translation of orthodox religious texts in the fifteenth.

Fundamental to this work, however, is another pillar of my scholarly priorities: that such texts have to be seen against the deep background of their contemporary textual, social and intellectual environment. My interest in deep context also drives my work on History of the Book. No matter how abstract the ideas, the manuscripts and early printed books always have things to tell us, often in unexpected aspects of layout, ordinatio and metatext, as well as the more expected (and often exquisitely historically layered) signs of readerly response.

My primary teaching responsibilities are in the taught Masters courses offered by the Faculty of English. I also lecture to undergraduates on medieval topics and on modern British drama.  

Professor Gillespie is Director of Research Strategy for the English Faculty. He was elected to the Fellowship of the British Academy in 2013.

Lady Margaret Hall website

Publications

  • Seek, Suffer and Trust: Ese and Disese in Julian of Norwich

  • The Nearly Man: 'Saint' Richard Rolle and his Textual Cult

  • The Songs of the Threshold: Enargeia and the Psalter

  • Middle English religious writing in practice. Texts, readers, and transformations.

  • A Companion to the Early Printed Book in Britain, 1476-1558

  • Dame Study’s Anatomical Curse: A Scatological Parody?

  • More
List of site pages