Professor Richard McCabe
Prof McCabe is currently on a Major Leverhulme Fellowship (2011-14) to write a monograph on literary patronage in the Early Modern period. His research interests include Satire, rhetoric, Puritan literature, Spenser, Anglo-Irish studies and post-colonialism, Renaissance and Restoration drama. Currently working on Renaissance Tragedy and the English and Gaelic literature of Elizabethan and Jacobean Ireland.
I currently give lectures, classes or seminars on Spenser, Utopian Literature, and Renaissance Drama for both graduates and undergraduates, and supervise masters and doctors dissertations in the same areas.
Professor of English Literature and Fellow of Merton College Oxford. Fellow of the British Academy. Formerly Lecturer at Brasenose College Oxford, Fellow of Trinity College Dublin, Lecturer at University College Dublin, and Drapers' Research Fellow at Pembroke College Cambridge.
Spenser and Ireland
My interest in Spenser began with an examination of the intellectual background to his epic verse published as The Pillars of Eternity: Time and Providence in The Faerie Queene (1987). That monograph also contained my first examination of Spenser and colonialism (pp. 39-47), a subject to which I returned in 'The Fate of Irena: Spenser and Political Violence', published in Spenser and Ireland: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , edited by Patricia Coughlan (1989), 109-125. This essay concentrates on Spenser's relationship with Lord Grey, but it was evident to me that more attention needed to be directed towards his attitudes towards Gaelic Society. In ‘Edmund Spenser: Poet of Exile', the British Academy Chatterton Lecture on Poetry for 1991, I therefore attempted to re-orientate Spenser Studies in this direction by making a new case for seeing the whole of The Faerie Queene , not just Book V, as informed by Spenser's Irish experience. I also sought to establish the importance of Spenser's complex relationship to the Irish bards, explored the importance of Spenser's linguistic views to his concept of nationality and colonialism, illustrated his attitude to Irish surnames and topography, demonstrated the polemic uses to which he put etymology and (emergent) ethnography, and discussed some Gaelic responses to his work (see Proceedings of the British Academy, 80 (1993), 73-103). I developed these ideas further with particular attention to linguistic issues at papers delivered at the International Spenser Conference at Yale in 1996 (published as ‘Translated States: Spenser and Linguistic Colonialism' in Edmund Spenser: Essays on Culture and Allegory , edited by Jennifer Klein Morrison and Matthew Greenfield (2000), pp. 67-88), and the MLA at San Francisco in 1998 (largely published as ‘Ireland: Policy, Poetics, and Parody' in The Cambridge Companion to Edmund Spenser, edited by Andrew Hadfield (2001), pp. 60-78). The award of a British Academy Readership (1999-2001) enabled me to consolidate and expand these studies into the monograph Spenser's Monstrous Regiment: Elizabethan Ireland and the Poetics of Difference (2002) which also incorporates the plenary lecture, '"Not one Parnassus": Spenser and the Rival Poets' delivered at the International Spenser Conference in Cambridge in 2001.
While working on Spenser and Ireland I also wrote a series of articles on other literary aspects of the canon and edited Edmund Spenser: The Shorter Poems (Penguin, 1999).
Publications
-
-
‘“O pierlesse Poesye, where is then thy place?”’: Locating Patronage in Spenser’
March 2018|Journal article|Spenser Studies: a Renaissance poetry annual -
'Patronage, Gentility and "Base Degree": Edmund Spenser and Lord Burghley'
September 2017|Journal article|Seventeenth Century -
Patrons
October 2016|Chapter|Edmund Spenser in ContextLiterary Criticism -
'Ungainefull Arte' Poetry, Patronage, and Print in the Early Modern Era
February 2016|BookFrom antiquity to the Renaissance the pursuit of patronage was central to the literary career, yet relationships between poets and patrons were commonly conflicted, if not antagonistic, necessitating compromise even as they proffered stability and status. Was it just a matter of speaking lies to power? The present study looks beyond the rhetoric of dedication to examine how traditional modes of literary patronage responded to the challenge of print, as the economies of gift-exchange were forced to compete with those of the marketplace. It demonstrates how awareness of such divergent milieux prompted innovative modes of authorial self-representation, inspired or frustrated the desire for laureation, and promoted the remarkable self-reflexivity of Early Modern verse. By setting English Literature from Caxton to Jonson in the context of the most influential Classical and Italian exemplars it affords a wide comparative context for the reassessment of patronage both as a social practice and a literary theme.